| Suburbia largely remains hostile territory for public transit
in America and, indeed, much of the developed world. Transit's market share of every
type of trip is steadily eroding outside of central cities virtually the world over.
With trip origins and destinations spread all over the map, traditional
fixed-route, fixed-schedule, radially oriented transit services are finding it
increasingly difficult to compete with the private automobile. Yet against this
backdrop, some metropolitan areas both in the United States and abroad have responded to
low-density development patterns by designing more flexible, market-responsive forms of
mass transit. Many strategies aim to eliminate, or at least marginalize, what is the
scourge of suburban transit services worldwide -- the transfer. |
This study examines adaptive transit as a promising approach
toward better serving suburban markets. Initially, adaptive transit is defined and
classified. Case studies from both the United States and abroad are then used to
examine experiences across ten different forms of adaptive transit. "Best
case" examples are cited, where possible. In addition to describing the
rationales and service features of different forms of adaptive transit, case reviews focus
on evaluating performance impacts, particularly with reference to "control
cases" for which traditional suburban services, in otherwise comparable settings,
remain in place. Moreover, attention is given to matters of implementation. In
most cases, the "software" (i.e., public policies) that accompanied the
"hardware" (i.e., technologies and service innovation) was every bit as
important in achieving success. |