This
article makes the case that legally required participation methods in
the US not only do not meet most basic goals for public participation,
but they are also counterproductive, causing anger and mistrust. Both
theory and practice are dominated by ambivalence about the idea of
participation itself. Both struggle with dilemmas that make the
problems seem insoluble, such as the conflict between the individual
and collective interest or between the ideal of democracy and the
reality that many voices are never heard. Cases are used to draw on an
emerging set of practices of collaborative public engagement from
around the world to demonstrate how alternative methods can better
meet public participation goals and how they make moot most of the
dilemmas of more conventional practice. |
Research
shows that collaborative participation can solve complex, contentious
problems such as budget decision making and create an improved climate
for future action when bitter disputes divide a community. Authentic
dialogue, networks and institutional capacity are the key elements.
The authors propose that participation should be understood as a
multi-way set of interactions among citizens and other players who
together produce outcomes. Next steps involve developing an
alternative practice framework, creating forums and arenas, adapting
agency decision processes, and providing training and financial
support.
|